About Us

My photo
Fairfield, Queensland, Australia
Fairfield Writers Group is a mix of beginner and experienced writers who meet the second and fourth Saturdays of the month at the Brisbane City Council Library in Fairfield Gardens Shopping Centre, Fairfield road, Fairfield, Queensland. Our passion is writing and we work hard at our craft. Our aim is to encourage, support and help each other to reach new heights in our writing. New members are always made welcome and usually whisked off to the local coffee shop at the end of meetings for sustenance and socialisation with the rest of the crew.

Welcome to Fairfield Writers Group

We hope you will stop for a while and browse our site and if you like what you see, please visit us again soon.

Friday, September 9, 2011

WRITING EXERCISE FOR SEPTEMBER 2011

Working With Words

Fairfield Writers Group

EXERCISE FOR SEPTEMBER 2011



REPORT VERSUS STORY

.

EXERCISE: 

1.     Write a report a 350 word report the following story :

The Road Turned, the Car Didn't


by Anonymous
(USA)

The roads were curved. The night was dark. I was lost. I didn't own a cell phone. I was still in high school. My boyfriend was calling my cousin, who just HAD to live in the middle of nowhere, trying again to get instructions.

I made it up the windy road only to find a dead end and not my cousin's house. I made a U-turn and began the descent down the road and then...I still don't know what happened. I caught some dirt, didn't quite turn and as I tell people when they ask about my car, "the road turned..I didn't."

I landed upside down in a ravine. Thankfully it was someone's yard. We knocked on their doorbell and were greeted by a smiling couple, "Did you land in our yard?" the man asked as the woman welcomed us in, "Not to worry. Second time this month. If we knew you were coming we would have saved dinner! Would you like some desert?"

How awful that the road is so poorly designed this family is used to cars landing upside down in their backyard!


http://www.car-accident-advice.com/the-road-turned-the-car-didnt.html

                                                            OR

      2.    Write a 350 word story on the following report :

“Turnaround not working, resident claims

West End residents are concerned a $1.5 million bus turnaround, built by the Brisbane City Council, is going to waste.

West End residents are concerned a $1.5 million bus turnaround, built by the Brisbane City Council, is going to waste.

The turnaround, on the corner of Hoogley and Orleigh streets, was built to prevent the CityGlider using a surrounding group of residential streets, Morry St, Gray Rd and Hoogley St, as a make-shift turnaround.

Gloria Collie, 41, said buses were still using the streets and banking on Hoogley St, even when spaces were available at the bus turnaround.

She said residents already had to endure frequent 192 and 199 buses and that the CityGlider services to Teneriffe had added more noise pollution.

"It's not just engine noise, it's the breaking and acceleration noises," she said.

Ms Collie said safety was also a concern as residents had trouble crossing the streets.

"Our community is very diverse, there are elderly people, lots of children and people who are disabled," Ms Collie said.

However, Brisbane City Council public and active transport chairman Julian Simmonds said all CityGlider buses should utilise the turnaround.

He claimed the turnaround had "halved" the number of buses travelling on suburban streets.

"The only instance where they wouldn't utilise the turnaround would be if the stop was filled up and they had to go ... into Hoogley St to the hold up bays," he said.

He said residents should write to him if buses were avoiding the turnaround when spaces were available.

"If they were going to Hoogley St when there was space at the bus stop ... we would have to address that with the individual driver concerned," he said.

Ms Collie said residents also wanted to reduce the number of 192 and 199 buses travelling in local streets.

However, a Translink spokesman said they were not considering changes.

The Translink spokesman said inbound services departed from a stop on Orleigh St, beyond the turnaround, so they were unable to return via Hoogley St.”

  • Kate Higgins
  • From: Quest Newspapers
  • August 10, 20119:54AM
  • http://www.couriermail.com.au/questnews/central/turnaround-not-working-resident-claims/story-fn8ygho7-1226112197695



 


REPORTS vs STORIES: HOW DO THEY DIFFER




Writers who have extensive experience in technical, business, and other non-fiction writing often struggle with the transition to story writing. It can be difficult to break the habit of documenting events and conversation objectively, and drawing conclusions that are stated and supported by reference to facts.

A report should relate facts in a very direct and un-emotive manner.

In a story, you want to put the reader in a scene and let him watch events take place, observe the characters, hear their tone of voice as well as what they say. Let him observe the setting, smell the odours, feel the character’s emotion.

When the mother is called to the principal’s office to discuss her problem son, your reader is a fly on the wall. What does he see and hear? Is she shivering… white faced… red faced… pounding the desk… shouting at the principal? 

When she comes home to have coffee with her friend and report on the events of the day, does her friend notice, as she sets the coffee cup in front of her,

·         that the woman who always manicured her lovely nails weekly and was inevitably meticulously groomed – has ragged, broken or bitten nails with the polish half off;

·         that her hair is uncombed;

·         that she’s not wearing stockings and her legs are hairy??

·         That the hem of her skirt is hanging down or a button is missing from her blouse? 

Does she worry, wondering if her friend looked like that when she went to the school.

Is she concerned what people might think? 

Is her friend teary-eyed as she tells what happened, or resigned.

Did the principal notice that she wasn’t the elegant, poised, self-assured woman who came to enrol her son a year ago?  What did he notice that was different?

When the man kicks the dog, how does the dog react. Is his yelp high pitched, or does he give a low, threatening growl?

How does the girl smell? Yes, we know she isn’t bathing often enough, and has body odour, but what does the smell remind you of, specifically? Can you compare it to something specific?  Urine… or vomit perhaps? 

When the man is frightened, how does he show it? Does he turn pale? Does his hand shake?

Rather than REPORTING what happened, what someone saw, what someone did, etc., the story teller paints a scene and lets the reader actually experience it for themselves. If a story is well-written, the reader should finish it feeling as though they were temporarily transported into the body and mind of someone else and lived an experience as that person. You want your reader to say “Oh my goodness!  I was there!  I saw it. I felt it. I actually lived it!”

The following table lists some of the specific differences between a report and a story.


A REPORT

A STORY

Tells (reports) facts in a direct, un-emotive manner. 
Reveals information through the gradual unfolding of scenes in which dialog, description of reactions (and sometimes emotions) and events expose information.
Events usually related either in time sequence or sequenced to support the order of stated premises.
Events may be related in somewhat random order to maximize suspense
Leaves nothing relevant out, nor delays exposure of relevant data to confuse or create suspense
Writer deliberately selects what to include and what to leave out based on the effect desired. Delays exposure of information to maximize suspense and tension. Rearranges events so that the time sequence is incorrect but interest is maximized.
Forms and states judgments and conclusions (which must be backed up by argument and factual reporting
Leaves the reader to form judgments and conclusions.  Does not tell them how to feel or respond.
Facts stated rather blandly and only as far as they are specifically relevant. Eg. The weather is generally not mentioned unless it has a bearing on the conclusions in the report.
The writer seeks to paint a scene, so may comment on anything that is visible or can be sensed – even though it may be of minimal or no real importance.
Writer draws only on the senses that detect relevant data.
Writer draws on all senses – tells what the characters saw, smelled, heard, felt – what was happening in the background, described so the reader sees it, hears it, smells it, feels it.
Writer tells what happened. Feelings and emotions are reported only where specifically relevant and usually only to the extent that one or more subjects of the report stated their feelings or emotions.

Writer aims for maximum objectivity.
Writer unveils feelings and emotions un-objectively – unapologetically seeking to evoke specific responses in the reader, but never telling the reader how to respond.

The description must put the reader in the scene and MAKE them feel a certain way – without ever telling them to!

The reader wants to SEE the character turning white or shaking with rage; smell the coffee and toast; hear the clock ticking or the door slamming; feel the shiver running down the character’s spine.  Don’t TELL them about it. Make them experience it!
Writer tells rather than shows.
e.g.  Mrs Jones appeared to be frightened.
Writer shows rather than tells e.g.
He watched as the colour drained from Mrs. Jones’ face, her eyes bulged, and she began to tremble violently.
(Note, we don’t want to tell the reader she was frightened, or that he thought she looked frightened. We want the readers to see her reaction and make their own judgment.)
Be clear and direct. No surprises or confusion please.
Surprises and shock endings are good!  Shake the reader up a bit. May them say…”Oh my goodness!  I didn’t see that coming.”
Suspense is not usually desirable
Suspense is essential. Make the reader tense up, fearing what’s coming. Make him wonder! Keep him guessing. Take the tension up, then wind it down, then take it up and wind it down again. Create a roller coaster.
Tell directly. No devices please.
Use devices. Characters discover and read a diary, find and read old letters, receive and read a letter, write a letter, hear a radio or TV announcement, see a documentary, overhear a conversation, read a newspaper article, discover a mystery friend who remembers long-forgotten events, have a dream, recall something from the past…  There are a thousand ways to draw out background information for the reader.
Use filters to make it clear who saw, heard, did, or thought what.

e.g. Mrs Jones ignored the ‘Don’t Walk’ sign and stepped off the kerb. Mr Jones reported that he saw a black car speeding toward the intersection that his wife was crossing. He said that he noted that it was heading directly towards his wife. He said he felt very frightened.
Don’t use filters. Use direct action statements instead.
A black car sped toward the intersection. It was heading right for Mrs Jones, who had stepped recklessly off the kerb against the ‘Don’t Walk’ sign. Mr Jones, who had stopped at the lights, turned white and began to tremble violently.
Be truthful.
Be creative. Add some spice. Don’t worry if it’s not quite accurate (if this is a story based on fact).  Stories need excitement that goes beyond truth.
Be credible, but understand that truth is stranger than fiction. Often truth is incredible. If something incredible is reported, be very clear and objective and note that although it seems incredible, this is, in fact, what happened
Truth really is stranger than fiction, so often stating the truth makes a story unbelievable. Coincidences that happen in real life just don’t work in fiction. When the character goes to the other side of the world for a holiday and coincidentally runs into her elderly neighbour boarding the plane for home, the reader says ‘What utter nonsense.’ Sure, it happens in real life, but a fiction reader won’t swallow it!
Tell me what happened.


E.g.  Sarah took some time to respond to the knock on the door.
When she finally did respond, the caller (a neighbour who later called police) noted that she had a black eye, a lump on her forehead, and a split lower lip.

In her statement, Sarah said that she was embarrassed and frightened that he would report her condition and bring in the authorities to interfere in her life.

She said, “I hoped if I ignored the knock, the caller would go away. I knew if I suffered in silence, Jack would become remorseful and be good to me for a while, but if he was caught out either he would take it out on me, or, if he was sent to prison, we would lose the benefit of his wages coming in and the children and I would suffer more.”
Sarah confessed openly to Sergeant Bryce that while she hesitated that morning, she was formulating her plan to murder her husband by stabbing him while he slept.
Let me (the reader) experience what happened through the character. Let me BE him or her.

Example:
Who was it? Why must they come now, of all times?
Sarah waited. “Please make them go away,” whispered to the empty room.
She moved to the mirror and stood there, for a time, staring at that awful reflection --running her fingers over the lump on her forehead, studying the bruising around her eye, gently easing her lower lip down to measure the length of the cut and the extent of the swelling.
She’d made no attempt to apply makeup. What was the use? Anyway, it would hurt too much. She hadn’t even bothered to comb her hair. Her bathrobe – the same one she wore last night – was blood stained around the collar.
Her ribs hurt. She wondered should she seek an X-ray. Could they be broken? They mend themselves anyway – broken ribs. The doctor told her so that time she’d lied and said she fell. He didn’t offer any treatment.
She tried to peek through the window, but she couldn’t see the caller.
The clock counted the minutes… loudly. Tick, tock, tick, tock. It taunted her and dared her to make the caller wait so long he would think her out, and leave. But the lights were on. The radio was blaring. The smell of burnt bacon was wafting through the open kitchen window.
Maybe she should report it herself. What would they do? If they put Jack in jail, how would she feed the kids. If they didn’t, he would beat her again for dobbing him in.
Maybe she wanted the caller to see her… report it… take it out of her hands?  But no! That would only make things worse. Jack would blame her. He would drink to drown his anger at being caught out, and then he would beat her. He would withhold housekeeping money. He would be sharp with the children. He would berate her and curse her and refuse her every request for help. It would make it so very much worse. When she suffered silently, he eventually became remorseful and was good to her… for a while.
God, please make this visitor go away!”
And all the while, she plotted.. schemed… planned. She saw how it would all unfold, and she panted with excitement at the prospect freedom… and ultimately, peace.

A Useful Test:


Imagine you are in a theatre and your story is being played out on stage. Go through the story line by line and highlight all the bits that can’t be portrayed on the stage.

The set designer can paint backdrops or furnish sets to create the scene you described and reproduce smells.

The sound engineer can create the noises you describe.

The actors can speak the dialog you wrote and move, change facial expressions, make gestures, show a hand with broken fingernails, etc.

But mark the bits that the actors can’t act out or speak – the information that readers will get but play viewers won’t. How much of the story is highlighted. What critical information will the viewer miss out on?

Next, go through each scene and note all the questions the actors, sound engineer, and set designer will have to ask you in order to create the scene.

What didn’t you tell about the setting, and the character’s pose and expressions? 

No, you absolutely DO NOT want to tell it all.

Too much detail is probably worse than not enough, and no reader wants to read a lot of rambling irrelevant description about the colour of the mother’s skirt and the height of her heels.

You want to reveal a few critical titbits – enough to give the reader a feel for the important characteristics.

But you don’t want to leave them with no idea who this character is, what they look like, how they act, what social class they belong to… etc. They need enough to be able to picture and get to know the character – to feel like they have met them and spent enough time with them to understand them and relate to what they have been through.

WRITING EXERCISES FOR AUGUST 2011

FWG EXERCISE FOR AUGUST 2011



EXERCISE:  Write three limericks. Each, with three different themes

One sad, one romantic and one own choice.



LIMERICK

A limerick represents the lighter side of literature.

It represents the fun part as a joke represents the fun in our life.

Like a joke, it can be sad or emotional whilst still giving a smile.

History suspect that the origin of the limerick lies with a group of Irish soldiers  (from a town called Limerick), that were returning from a battle in France in 1700. In literature  Edward Lear is considered the father of the Limerick.

A limerick is a kind of witty, humorous nonsense poem with a strict rhythm scheme.

It is a five line poem containing a three lines rhymed triplet and a two lines rhymed couplet.

The pattern of the rhymes is a-a-b-b-a, with lines 1, 2, and 5 containing 3 beats and rhyming.

Lines 3 and 4 having 2 beats and rhyming. The cadans of the beats are as important as the rhyming.

The pun of the poem is mostly in line five

Example:    by C Alan Beber

The limerick is fugitive and mean

You must keep her in close quarantine

For she sneaks to the slums

And promptly becomes

Disorderly, drunk and obscene


NEWSLETTER-AUGUST 2011



Working With Words
                                               

Newsletter – August 2011

Fairfield Writers Group

Website http://fairfieldwritersgroup-queensland.blogspot.com


In this issue:

Minutes of meeting – Exercises Group

Minutes of meeting – Novel/Short Story Group

Meeting Dates
                                     August, 2011

Minutes of Exercise meeting

13th of August 2011

at

FAIRFIELD LIBRARY

Present: Anna, Carol, Jennifer, Maarten, Helga, Anne D, Findlay, Anne and Vera.
Minutes: Findlay

  • We welcomed Anne to the meeting.

  • The meeting revolved around Maaten’s proposal that each member write three limericks. Limericks were read out by Helga, Anna, Jennifer, Maarten and Findlay.

  • Anna undertook to put one limerick from each participant on the FWG blog.

  • All of the limericks were both clever and funny.

  • Anne will decide on the exercise for the next meeting

Next meetings:

10 September – Exercise Group       
    24 September– Novel/short story

Fairfield Writers Group Novel and Short Story Meeting
27th August 2011
MINUTES






Chair:  Findlay
Minutes:  Lorraine
Meeting opened 10:45 a.m.
Present:  Findlay, Lorraine, Helga, Maarten, Carol, Anne, Erwin, Wendy, Anne and Vera.
Apologies:  Anna
 
 
v  At Findlay’s request, the meeting commenced with discussion of a motion re management of future Anthology projects. Findlay correctly remarked that this was an FWG issue—not exclusively a 2011 Anthology Project team issue—as it affects participants in future Anthology projects who may or may not be part of the current Anthology project team.
 
 
v  Members read the motion and discussed it. Helga commented that future projects require a project manager—separate from the typesetter/editor/proof reader—to monitor deadlines and ensure members meet their obligations. Maarten agreed. There was general agreement with the proposal in the motion, including the proposal to bring forward payment of participation fees and that members who do not meet their obligations should have their stories removed and forfeit their participation fee.



   
v  Findlay requested that the motion be rewritten in an abbreviated form, and the motion be posted on the blog.




v  Lorraine moved the motion. Helga seconded. The motion was carried unanimously.

v  Vera apologized for not presenting writing work and said that she had been taken to task over her lack of participation. The group responded, in general agreement, that if she derives benefit from attending without presenting writing work, that is fine and she should continue to participate in ways she is comfortable with. Hopefully she will eventually feel confident to present writing pieces, but in the meantime her contribution to critiquing and discussion is appreciated and we are pleased that she derives pleasure and learning from her attendance.

  
Critiquing:
 
 
v  Carol presented a second draft of Chapter 1 of “Disaster the Second Time Around”. We are all looking forward to further installments of what promises to be an interesting tale.
 
 
v  Erwin presented a piece titled “Fruit of Thy Womb”, including reading a passage of it aloud. Members enjoyed the Phillipino flavour.
 
 
   
v  Helga presented a descriptive piece called “Brisbane-Mt Cootha Botanic Gardens”.  All agreed it would be ideal for a tourist brochure.
 
 
v  Anne presented the Eulogy she wrote for her mother’s funeral (read aloud by Lorraine). Though very personal and accordingly difficult to critique, all agreed the piece was beautifully written and very moving. Members made suggestions for stories about Anne’s mother’s life.
 
 
v  Lorraine presented a short story titled “What the Gypsy Knew”, about a woman visiting a fortune teller.
 
 
v  Findlay presented a short story called “Rosita”—a delightful story with a surprise ending.
The meeting closed at approx 12:45pm.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

ANTHOLOGY NEWSLETTERS FOR AUGUST

FWG 2ndANTHOLOGY
FAIRFIELD WRITERS’ GROUP MEETING

Anthology Meeting re media /
promotions / marketing
27th of August 2011
        
Present: Lou, Fin, Lorraine, Helga, Jen, Maarten
Absent: Anna
Chairing this meeting: Findlay
Co -Chair: Lou
Taking minutes this meeting: Lou


Meeting -12:45pm commenced: finished 3pm

The following key points were discussed in this meeting:

Discussion pre-meeting:

Discussion occurred at or before the Novel group meeting about determining rules and regulations for the writers group as well as future anthology projects

A motion was put up for vote at the beginning of the Novel Group Meeting to have rules and penalties governing participation in any future anthology projects and to have a project manager for managing deadlines and a project plan. It was approved unanimously.

The “Motion for Anthology Project Meeting” document by Lorraine was circulated at the Anthology meeting and was asked by Findlay to be abbreviated and posted on the FWG blog.

Jen – requested to raise concerns:

- disappointed with how things got to; didn’t like name in correspondence and asked group to ask her permission before including her name in future correspondence

- requested that future meetings need to stay to the agenda and that all personal topics are saved until after the meeting

Lorraine – need discussion / change to terms of engagement for future projects is needed

Maarten – suggested to close subject; all agreed


1. Introduction (preamble re media, promotions etc. ) Findlay.

-        activity divided in three parts (pre-launch, launch day and post-launch)

-        Pre-launch = promotion of the launch

-        Launch day (how to run the day)

-        post-launch = supply and distribution

-        Need to determine our goal as a group (eg to go to reprint) Group discussion

Need to be realistic in what we can do – eg highly unlikely that tv will promote the launch of our anthology however good avenues to pursue with radio that suit backgrounds of our authors and/or content of the stories

Reminder that greatest chance of selling anthology is to friends, family and FWG members, and through word of mouth


Positives for media attention are:

- Lorraine’s experience of the flood

- Helga’s experience of WWII in East Germany

- Jen’s experience as a friend of a family supporting a son with schizophrenia


 2. Confirm spokespersons; the nature of the role of a spokesperson, details, phone numbers, availability

Lorraine, Helga and Jen agreed to be primary contacts for radio press releases

Idea: cheat sheet for members to assist with radio interviews with details of anthology launch and suppliers of books;

- Agreed; Lou to develop cheat sheet by next meeting (10 September)

Anna to be primary contact for generic press release; Fin and Lou as back ups for contact information.


3. Approve/alter media releases:

Discussion on each media release:

(a)    Helga’s story

(b)   Lorraine’s story

(c)    Jennifer’s story (Jen to email Fin with new word for ‘harrowing’)

Fin to email corrected media releases to members

(d)   Generic for print publications (newspapers, other)

Lou has all comments; will email final copy with minutes to members


4. Discuss “angles” and briefing for spokespersons/authors approach to media

-        Lou: Queensland Writers Week is 10 – 16 October; free media kit available with registration of our launch on the QWW website; Lou registered launch and will follow up with QWW contacts to include our details on their website

-        Fin – Coffee News publication for local cafes; will follow up to see if launch can be included on their ‘newsletter’

5. Decide time-lines for distribution of media releases, contact with radio stations etc

  • Fin to contact radio stations (6124QR; 4EB) and Brisbane News by 15 September; possibility of 4KQ and 4BH if other stations do not work out
  • Jen to contact 4RPH and The Road Ahead (by 15 September?)
  • Lou to contact print publications with generic press release;
  • add City news to Quest Newspapers on Media Contacts List
  • Local News – by Tuesday 30 August
  • Quest / Courier Mail – by 10 September
  • QWC October 2011 and February 2012 Newsletters – done (Anna to do interview for February newsletter)
6. Determine media outlets to be approached (Lou and Findlay to supply same)

-        see Media Contacts list as per email from Lou

-        radio stations to approach and how to do so

See Point 5 for list and by when

7. Internet: spread word on Facebook, Twitter, emails to friends, relatives etc Full meeting discussion.

-        QWW website with State of Writing

-        FWG blog

-        Promote on FWG Facebook page and on our own social networking media sites

 
8. Determine other organisations that may have an interest in buying the anthology

    Eg. Seniors clubs, schizophrenia support groups etc.

-          Agreed to wait after the launch to see how many books we have to promote and sell to seniors groups; should be at a discount (“a seniors’ discount”)

-          Jen to investigate newsletters for schizophrenia support groups / Queensland Health sponsored newsletters for mental health for promotion and possible sales

9. Discuss other possible outlets for media coverage: eg Road Ahead, LinkedIn, etc

            - see above for Coffee News, and print and online promotion

            - approach Nicole Johnston to include launch details in her newsletter

            - Lorraine to forward press release to other writing groups


10. Allocate work-load for pre-launch media/promotions, poster distribution

-          Jen and Lou to print posters on A3; Jen to pass copies to FWG members at 10 September meeting; Lou to assist with poster print as back up to Jen if required


11. Launch day.

Order of speakers/authors readings. Availability of lectern, microphone, stage(?), catering, seating, thank-you gifts for speakers etc.

 -        number of books for launch vs reprint (Lorraine and Helga's email)

-        may need members to put their allocated books back in the pool for sales depending on how numbers go

 -        Need to check with Library / Librarian on availability of lectern and microphone; or check with Nicole Johnston’s office

-        Thank you gifts – (3) – Nicole, Estelle and Sophie to each receive a book and a bottle of wine ($10 each)

-        Run Sheet:

-        Anna as MC

-        Estelle and Sophie to speak

-        Helga, Lorraine, Jen and Anna (?) to read from their stories

-        Nicole to close

-        Anticipating if everyone speaks for 5 minutes, then total speeches are 35 minutes

-        Seating needed (60 chairs were available for 2009 Anthology Launch) and tables where authors can sign and sell copies of the book

  -        Catering: Lorraine to look into options for $250 budget (Coles platters and local     caterers) and will email the group; tea/coffee/juice were supplied by library last year and needs follow up again; 150 estimated to attend

-        Money handling and sales on the day:

-        Members not reading to assist Carol Jell with selling the book

-        Receipt books to have duplicates to keep track of contact details of those who purchase

-        Helga to design sign for table; asked Fin to email design ideas – sign for selling books at launch and other future functions

 -        tee shirt interest (Helga)

-        three orders taken

  - Photographer for launch day – Helga has friend who can take professional-looking   photos for no cost and will approach them

12. Post launch.

-        Discuss stall in Fairfield Gardens

-        Helga to approach centre management to put up posters as well as a stall in the shopping centre

-        Further media including QWC newsletter article for February 2012

-        Indooroopilly Library book signing again (as per first anthology)

-        Suggestion to have a book signing at Fairfield in future, rather than Indooroopilly? For future  discussion

-        sales possibilities and how to keep retailers stocked

-        money collection and handling after sales

-        See below on tax invoices and clear book covers

-        Record keeping for an archive for future members


13. Any other business

Helga – 50c per clear cover for all consignment books; to protect them at the book shop / retailer; Agreed to buy

Helga / Lorraine – draft tax invoice for record of consignment sales; will be emailed to members

Lorraine – GST costs for retailers and profit margins; proposed we increase margin for retailers to cover GST: make $4.95 per book ($12.95 = $8 cost + $4.95 profit) and retailers make $7.00 ($1.81 GST + profit);

Agreed by group

Lou - Avid Reader Event – dates for 18 and 20 October from 6pm – 8pm are free for a book signing/reading event at Avid Reader; for a private event, the cost is $300 and Avid provide staff, seating, microphone and catering (wine and cheese)

            - group concerned the cost is too expensive; Lou to approach Avid when Events Organiser is back at work (30 August) to negotiate a reduced cost



FWG 2nd ANTHOLOGY
FAIRFIELD WRITERS’ GROUP MEETING
13th of August 2011



Present: Findlay, Lou, Anna, Helga, Jennifer, Carol and Maarten
Absent: Lorraine
Chairing this meeting: Anna
Taking minutes this meeting: Findlay

The following key points were discussed in this meeting:

Anthology payment:
Carol confirmed that all anthology participants had paid the outstanding fees towards publication.
Anna brought the meeting up to date with progress on the anthology:

• Lorraine had arranged for the final proof to be delivered to the printer, For the Love of Books, Moorooka on Friday, August 12.

• The launch of “Life’s a Roller Coaster” was now confirmed: 11am-1.0pm on October 15, Fairfield Library, Fairfield.

• Endorsements would be included in future media releases.

• A sample of the anthology was likely to be available for the FWG meeting on September l0.

• It was hoped the finished book would be ready by October 8, and it was hoped copies could be distributed to each participant at the Fairfield library on that day.

Supporters: The meeting heard that ten businesses and other premises had agreed to take some copies of the anthology on consignment and/or display FWG posters.

Media/promotion: There was a wide-ranging discussion regarding media/promotions and marketing but because of time constraints it was agreed that a special meeting be held as soon as practicable to focus purely on those issues. Anna undertook to set a date and advise anthology members accordingly.

T-shirt: Helga brought a FWG tee-shirt to the meeting and it was decided that each member wishing to purchase a tee shirt for $24.95c would be able to decide the wording that would accompany the FWG logo: ie Working with Words or Fairfield Writers Group.

Package: It was agreed that customers could be offered a package deal-ie a copy of “Beginings” and “Life’s a Roller Coaster”.

Next Anthology Meeting: Saturday 27th of August 2011
12pm at the back of the Fairfield Library